Meaning of ‘Well Regulated’ Confounds Gun-Rights Advocates

dbkFAIRFAX, Va.—A gathering of top scholars among gun rights advocates meeting at the headquarters of the National Rifle Association yesterday remained divided and perplexed by the words “well regulated” in the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

“It’s a term that has always been a mystery to gun rights advocates, but I think we made considerable progress in nailing down what the Founding Fathers of the United States meant by it,” says Leonard Clounts, a constitutional scholar at Sam Houston University in Texas and chair of an NRA task force that’s been asked to forge a policy statement on the meaning of the term.

The text of the Second Amendment, as adopted and made part of the Constitution in 1791, reads as follows:

“A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

“We get the part about the right to keep and bear arms,” says Peter Brooks, a professor of law at the University of Kentucky in Lexington. “That means any American citizen can own guns, semi-automatics, machine guns, even heavy armaments like bazookas and anti-aircraft missiles. You don’t need to be a legal scholar to see that. But ‘well regulated’ is certainly more nuanced, with differing interpretations any time the term comes up for discussion.”

Not a 2nd Amendment scholar

Not a 2nd Amendment scholar

Task force members, in their morning discussion yesterday, quickly rejected the idea that “well regulated” meant the government could impose rules on the ownership of guns, since gun ownership is conditioned on the need for a well regulated militia.

“What’s pretty clear is that the Founding Fathers had no intent in creating a militia in which the members of the militia had to meet any kind of litmus test,” said Arnold Peartman, a professor of law at Tennessee State University. “You have to remember, when the Constitution was written, state and local militias were all-voluntary. Of course, some men were well-trained in the use of arms, others weren’t. Some were responsible users of arms, others weren’t. Given this, ‘well regulated’ couldn’t mean that militias were subject to any controls.”

“Without a doubt, there was no desire among lawmakers to impose any rules on who could be in a militia or whether they had to meet any criteria to own a gun,” says Bill Talent, an NRA board member who sits on the task force. “Could someone who was known to drink to excess and shoot off his gun in the local tavern be put through any kind of test that would keep him out of the militia? Of course not. Nor would a man who was known to threaten violence whenever he was challenged be kept out of the militia. And since psychological disorders as we know them today didn’t exist back then, there was no reason to keep out ‘psychos’ and ‘schizoids,’ because they didn’t exist.”

Shays og Gray

Shays of Gray: Petersham, Mass.

Brooks, the University of Kentucky scholar, says “well regulated” likely means militia members could assemble as a group to intimidate people, including local or state officials, if they didn’t get their way. “That’s proven by Shays’ Rebellion,” said Brooks. “That was a mob put together by freedom lovers who didn’t like the austerity measures Massachusetts put into place to balance the state’s budget,” said Brooks. “The patriots thought the government should take on debt to help people out during a time of economic hardship, and when the state instead tried to pay down its debt and live within its means, the freedom lovers formed a mob, as envisioned by the Constitution.”

Talent says the unconditional nature of gun ownership, in which gun ownership is premised on the need for a volunteer militia to be well regulated, means the imposition of any rules on the militia is a violation of the Constitution. “Can you say, ‘You’re a criminal, therefore you can’t be in the militia, and therefore you’re subject to restrictions on owning a gun?’ Of course you can’t say that. Just because gun ownership is premised on the need for a well regulated militia doesn’t mean you can’t own a gun if you’re disqualified from being in the militia. You can clearly own a gun even if you can’t qualify for the militia.”

“Freedom-haters who say anyone who can’t qualify for the militia shouldn’t be allowed to own a gun are clearly trying to impose a socialist form of government on us,” says Clounts. “Even though gun ownership is premised on the need for a well regulated militia, it doesn’t follow from that that you can’t own a gun if you can’t qualify for the militia.”

Clounts said the scholars wrapped up the first day of discussion by agreeing that the term “well-regulated militia” as the premise for gun ownership meant anyone can own a gun regardless of whether they can qualify for the militia, because “well regulated” means anyone with a gun and is an American citizen can own a gun or multiple guns or even automatic weapons.

The task force is scheduled to host a final vote on the meaning of the term tomorrow, but Clounts says the hard work is behind them now. “We pretty much have a consensus, so tomorrow’s vote is really a formality. And then it goes to the board of the NRA to vote on our definition of the term. Then it’ll be clear what “well regulated” means in the context of in the Second Amendment.”

This is a work of satire. It is a fictional article not meant to be taken seriously. Photos dk , dbk, and ek (Creative Commons). Not necessarily an endorsed use of images.

More stories: 

Obama: NRA Too Scary for Lawmakers to Curb Guns

What can you do?

President Barack Obama said the latest mass shooting, at the Umpqua Community College in Roseburg, Ore., is another reminder the United States must take action on guns, but because the National Rifle Association is so scary, he knows nothing will happen. “Would we like something to happen?” he said in his remarks in the James Brady White House Press Office today. “Of course. Who wouldn’t? But when you have an organization that’s as scary as the NRA defending gun rights, there’s no way you’re gong to get any action taken.” Obama says he favors tighter and more expanded background checks and limits on the sale of automatic weapons. He also favors allowing states and municipalities to curb gun sales in their jurisdictions. More.

NRA Protests U.S. Ban on Privately Owned Military Assault Vehicles

ec File:SAM-HMMWV.jpg tm File:Mitrovica.jpg

WASHINGTON—The National Rifle Association today staged a protest outside the U.S. Department of Transportation here against that agency’s ban on privately owned military assult-styled vehicles on federally funded highways. “It looks like Barack Hussein Obama wants to make sure only the government has the right to bear arms when those arms are attached to motorized vehicles,” NRA President Wayne LaPierre said at the protest, which involved blocking Constitution Ave. with dozens of privately owned vehicles adapted to accommodate military-styled automatic weapons, including several with grenade launchers. “Well, the U.S. Constitution makes clear that guns don’t have to be carried on one’s person for us to enjoy the freedom to have them. Just because they’re mounted on vehicles doesn’t make us any less free to carry our guns.” More.

NAR Pushes ‘Not Liking Your Looks’ Laws

Warren LaPierre

WASHINGTON—Buoyed by the success of its effort to get “Stand Your Ground” laws passed in states throughout the country, the National Rifle Association today launched a nationwide campaign to get “Not Liking Your Looks” laws passed. “Every day people are terrorized by people who look at them in ways that are menacing or intimidating,” NRA CEO and Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre said at a press conference here. “Americans shouldn’t have to stand for that, not when we have a Constitutional right to own and use guns, because every confrontation starts with a look. Under our reasonable and sensible ‘Not LIking Your Looks” laws, law-abiding Americans can head off dangerous confrontations by firing the first shot and stopping a confrontation before it starts.” More.

Families Thank NRA For Creating ‘Communities of Fear’

fear Thousands of families in cities across the United States today thanked the National Rifle Association for instilling a culture of fear throughout America with its demonization of anyone who talks about regulations to keep automatic weapons out of the hands of criminals and people with a history of mental illness. “It’s with our deepest gratitude that we, families of America, extend our thanks to the National Rifle Association for everything it has done to create ‘communities of fear’ across our great country,” the families said in a statement released today. “Thanks to its resolute stand that families like ours should take our security in our own hands, whether by hiring private security guards or keeping guns under our pillow at night, we live in a growing state of fear and distrust. And that’s something the NRA deserves credit for.” More.

Gun Activist Shoots Off Nose

elvertbarnesWASHINGTON, D.C.–A gun rights activist who thinks anyone who favors gun control of any type is a “socialist elitist who hates America” accidentally shot off his nose yesterday while at a rally here celebrating the second part of the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. “Nobe ub dis chages my biew dat weal Americans strap guns around der legs,” says John (“J.D.”) Ray, the activist, from his room at George Washington University Hospital in Washington. Doctors treating the activist say they are attempting to reconstruct his nose using tissue from other parts of his body because the accidental point-blank shot left nothing of Ray’s original nose to work with. More.